Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: "Ian" <ian.groups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 10:48:05 -0700
Neil Williams wrote:
Ian wrote:
That would be really quite bizarre. Do they think that CRB checks done
for the guides are more thorough, or more durable, than those done for
other organisations.
Perhaps the Guide Association also run the Confidential Enquiry check
on a similar level to the Scout Association (or even the same
database)?
That would be a different matter, of course. We run our own checks,
too, and we place a heck ofa lot more weight on them than on the CRB
stuff.
Ian
.
- References:
- "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: Stephen Rainsbury
- Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: John Russell
- Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: chris.5th
- Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: Louise
- Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: chris.5th
- Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: Ian
- Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- From: Neil Williams
- "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- Prev by Date: Results - HowToGiveToCharity
- Next by Date: Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- Previous by thread: Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- Next by thread: Re: "Scout Master" found guilty of paedophillia
- Index(es):