Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: "Stephen Rainsbury" <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ->
- Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:14:52 GMT
"GAGS" <absolutecrapgags.nw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:448dd451_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If its a big issue you could probably work it out yourself by finding a
decent length linear feature like a straight road or railway track.
Eh?????
(I think with all this early posting your brain hasn't warmed up yet!)
If you can see a nice long length of railway track on the map and you know excatly where you are then put your compass next to it (but not too close) and take a bearing.
Now measure teh angle on teh map and the difference is the error.. I thank you :-)
The point is hammered home when one tries to use a compass on a
dead-reckoning to find a point feature in say a forest. (A common occurence
if one does a lot of orienteering!) We don't take a bearing dead-on the
point feature and set off! No, we look for an attack feature, best of all a
handrail (a linear feature) and aim off to one side such that when we reach
the attack feature we know which way to go to reach the point feature
Agreed, and in open country that attack point maybe the only feature for miles, however as you said Liner features are better as they tend to be more accurate for some reason.
Of course one could just say 'bugger the drift' and open a few more cans and
wait until someone finds you! :-)
Not in Explorers any more :-)
GAGS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: DuncanHill
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: steviephilips
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: DuncanHill
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: steviephilips
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: Eddie Langdown
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: Stephen Rainsbury
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: GAGS
- Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Prev by Date: Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Next by Date: Re: 4x4's, let's have a heated debate :-)
- Previous by thread: Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Next by thread: Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Index(es):