Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: steviephilips@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 10 Jun 2006 00:35:48 -0700
I am totally pants at maths,
but to be 185 yards out after a mile's walking with a 2 deg error!
That is a huge distance... I had no idea.
I had imagined it would be a few feet and that these accurate devaitions
were just for airline pilots and ship's captains.
I think your error was 6 degrees.
There is no need for calculator that does trig to work out the
approximate error.
Consider the 1 mile as the radius of circle, the circumfrance of which
will be 6.28miles.
If your 1 degree out the error is (1/360)*6.28=0.0174mile or 30.7yds.
Thats close enough for small deviations.
So, I need to teach 2 deg now?
Its currently (from the data on the 2004 map) 2 deg 10 sec in the
centre of the central beacons sheet.
Using 2 degrees is close enough for all practical purposes.
As to using compasses in what you call 'lowland areas', I would say it is
just as important as anywhere.
Yes, what I really meant is that a serious navigation error in an
upland\mountain area could have life threatening consequences.
I walk quite a bit in lowland areas myself, I particullaly like coastal
paths. But navigational errors on a coastal path are unlikely to have
any serious consequences.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: DuncanHill
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: steviephilips
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: DuncanHill
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: steviephilips
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: Eddie Langdown
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: steviephilips
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: GAGS
- Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- From: Eddie Langdown
- Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Prev by Date: Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Next by Date: Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Previous by thread: Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Next by thread: Re: Maps! (let's have a seperate thread, instead of using roll call)
- Index(es):