Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: Paul Harris <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:29:09 +0000
In message <dtlvbv$15ns$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Knowlege is Powder <noyouc@xxxxxxxxx> writes
"Stephen Rainsbury" <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -> wrote in message
news:P1uLf.25595$wl.14628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If this is REALLY an insurance reason and not just somebody's idea of a
joke then change insurers! get somebody willing to take the risk or at
least give us the option of taking extra cover!
It seems to be that the Insurers are always bowing to the claimans or
compensation seeker and not the views of the policy holder.
No one has actually said that this has anything at all to do with insurance (unless I missed something). I would suggest that someone has looked at the ratios for each section and thought it would be a good idea for Scouts to also have a ratio so they have just extrapolated from Beavers and Cubs to Scouts. It is going to cause real problems and needs to be re-thought.
--
Paul Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: GAGS
- Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: Stephen Rainsbury
- Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: John Russell
- Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- References:
- Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: Ewan Scott
- Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: Tony Mochan
- Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: Stephen Rainsbury
- Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- From: Knowlege is Powder
- Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- Prev by Date: Re: How did they sneak this one in
- Next by Date: Re: Why lay-down and take it?
- Previous by thread: Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- Next by thread: Re: Rule 3:9 f Open Letter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
