Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: PyroJames <DrPyroJames@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Apr 2007 01:22:49 -0700
On Apr 25, 9:47 pm, "TonyB" <Norf...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
but unlike a Sadler, it is timber and therefore quite sinkable,
According to a definition given some moments ago, if it's timber it must be
unsinkable.
Well it didn't float just after it was built. Something to do with a
wharf being in the way, when it tried to rise with the tide! (Before I
owned it! In fact I think I was only 4 at the time)
PyroJames.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: Xander
- Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- References:
- A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: Xander
- Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: Dennis Pogson
- Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: Quilljar
- Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: Dennis Pogson
- Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: PyroJames
- Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- From: TonyB
- A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- Prev by Date: Re: Deep Water
- Next by Date: Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- Previous by thread: Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- Next by thread: Re: A Quick one or two word response to Sadler 34
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|