Re: Bavarias.
- From: Stefan <dont@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:25:42 +0100
In article <4353f4e8$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
duncanheenan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
>
> "Martin" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uh97l1ht5emfaiedi4vu2bof0fi337b1c2@xxxxxxxxxx
> > On 17 Oct 2005 06:23:21 -0700, "Dan" <danny_deever2000@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >snip<.
> > Nobody has slagged off anything other than the 38 and 42.
> Yes they did. 'Stefan' slagged of the whole company and concluded that he
> wouldn't deal with them.
I'm not 'Stefan'. I'm Stefan. I'm willing to put my real name to my
opinions. So, presuambly, are you, which is admirable.
Saying I "slagged the whole company" is a rather simplistic
interpretation of what I said. I argued that from the evidence
available, which I rather carefully said is bound to be limited, that
the way they have dealt with the keel-shedding incident has put me off
them as a company to do business with. I said nothing about their
designs, build quality or a host of other things. Therefore I did not
"slag off the whole company". But you are correct to say I wouldn't deal
with them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bavarias.
- From: Duncan Heenan
- Re: Bavarias.
- From: Duncan Heenan
- Re: Bavarias.
- References:
- Bavarias.
- From: Dan
- Re: Bavarias.
- From: Dan
- Re: Bavarias.
- From: Duncan Heenan
- Bavarias.
- Prev by Date: Re: GPS availability in question?
- Next by Date: Re: Bavarias.
- Previous by thread: Re: Bavarias.
- Next by thread: Re: Bavarias.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|