Re: Ricoh drivers
- From: Chris Savage <spam.goes.here@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:58:07 +0000
On 2007-11-28, Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <5ii025-avq.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Chris Savage <spam.goes.here@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
|>
|> > Yes, but is that true of Ricoh? I couldn't find any specification of
|> > that aspect, though it might have been buried somewhere. There are
|> > lots of ways in which even 'standard' interfaces can be used/abused
|> > to prevent access from particular systems.
|> >
|> > No, of course it's not done deliberately, but that makes little
|> > difference to the person who has bought a pup. I am not an expert
|> > on USB interfaces and formats, and really don't want to have to
|> > become one :-(
|>
|> Well, if you don't own the camera in question (CIQ) you could:
|>
|> Go to your local camera shop, or even a Jessops, and ask them to
|> demonstrate the CIQ's connection to a PC without any Ricoh software
|> installed.
|>
|> Trust that a) it's in no manufacturer's interest and b) probably beyond
|> Ricoh's competence to engineer an in-house modification to the USB
|> standard. This stuff is bought in as reference designs and everybody's
|> works the same way.
You have missed the point. You don't NEED to do that to render things
Obviously. It was an easy point to miss given that you've only just got
around to actually making a point.
inoperable. I have decades of experience in this area, and one thing
that I learnt over 30 years ago is never to rely on interoperability
on those grounds alone. Here is one real life example where I have
seen such an issue - it wasn't a camera, and it wasn't any systems
currently available on a PC, but the principles are the same.
An awful lot of industry experience in interoperability and standards
has happened since the mid 1970s. Every camera manufacturer, with the
possible exception of Canon, is happy to benefit from that exception.
It is very unlikely THAT particular ``gotcha'' is present, but thereApparently your decades of experience have left you with so many
are a zillion similar ones that can be implemented without doing
anything non-standard. Until and unless I get confirmation from
someone trustworthy that Ricoh pictures can be read into (say) Linux
via a standard USB mount, I shall remain unconvinced (either way).
suspicions that the only possible answer to your lack of question is for
you to get the CIQ and subject it to your testing regime.
I don't think you'll find anyone else here, let alone substandard me
(it's a couple of decades since anyone talked down to me as if I was a
juvenile so thanks for that) who can answer questions that you can't be
bothered asking.
Do you think you could apply some of your experience to implementing a
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
proper sig separator, please?
--
Chris Savage Kiss me. Or would you rather live in a
Gateshead, UK land where the soap won't lather?
- Billy Bragg
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ricoh drivers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Ricoh drivers
- References:
- Ricoh drivers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Ricoh drivers
- From: Chris Savage
- Re: Ricoh drivers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Ricoh drivers
- From: Chris Savage
- Re: Ricoh drivers
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Ricoh drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: Selling old cameras and lenses on Ebay
- Next by Date: Re: Ricoh drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: Ricoh drivers
- Next by thread: Re: Ricoh drivers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|