Re: Quiet?
- From: marc <initial.surname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:41:11 +0000
Pete Knight wrote:
On Nov 14, 10:55 am, marc <initial.surn...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Pete Knight wrote:On Nov 14, 8:48 am, rebust...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:How do you prove a negative. If a message does not arrive, how do youDear bitter and twistedWell some of us (BN members) have got a new toy to play with at the moment!A number of us will be back here very shortly. The censorship has
--
Steve (as Himself)
started already and people are getting their accounts closed for
telling the truth. The inevitable threads about endemic discrimination
against single blokes and the dark trend towards paedophilia in a
number of clubs cropped up in the forums section. This is gritty real
world stuff that doesn't sit easily with the "Shiny happy people" crap
BN is trying to sell naturism as, so those who told the truth are
being "assassinated" for rocking the boat.
We never really expected anything else though did we?
Where have you seen censorship, I've seen no evidence of that,
know that it wasn't sent?
what> HAS hacked me off is the lack of response from anyone at the helm,
these are genuine members concerns and need addressing.Maybe the metaphor you use is an apt one? When the lookout screams
"iceberg on the Port bow" the man at the helm doesn't stand round and
chat about how big it is, what colour, do you think it will go with this
top etc... Equally if there are allegations of child abuse the
organisation that I am involved withs techniques are to take notes and
pass the allegation upwards, not make a huge thing of it and go off on a
half cocked investigation, perhaps the same is true here?
I'm the one making the most noise and nothing has been said to me, theYou have no evidence for your assertion and then start with abuse?
new forum is a tool for communicating these concerns, without the bile
and bitterness of disgruntled ex members, it has a funny side to it
too, something URN is devoid of, apart from the 14th disciple of
course.
Reading through your post suggests that you've not actually seen the
forum, perhaps you heard something from someone else and with the
usual human trait you've embellished it a little, how sad you are!
Subjects are being raised and points are being put across without theI would suggest that it is you that has used an unfreindly tone, is that
censorship you imagine, it is a lively friendly atmosphere, in clear
contrast to your post here.
perhaps becuase it's your baby that's being critiscised?
I have no direct involvement with the new forum, I'm just an eager
participant, so of course I'm brassed off that allegations are being
flung about, without foundation I might add!! The new forum is a
breath of fresh air, and a reminder of the good old days of Ian
Battersby's gobare, the real article, even one of URN's foremost
cynic's has praised the forum.
Be careful your slip is showing.
Paedophilia is child abuse.
There have been no allegations of child abuse, that is your phrase,
the original phrase was of "paedophilia in a number of clubs" which
appears to have been derived from the discussion about 'dubious
activities' in certain establishments, at no time was child abuse
suggested, so you can see how this Chinese whisper is developing.
Before passing judgement I would suggest you review the evidence first
hand, of course that would require membership of BN in order to gain
access to the forum, or you can get it second hand from someone who
heard it from a friend who knows a member!
I'm not passing judgment on anything outside of what has been posted here.
To sum up you said that censcorship was not taking place, I asked how you could know that.
You said that no one at the helm was takeing any notice, I asked how you could know that.
You complained about the tone here , i pointed out that your tone was not freindly
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quiet?
- From: Pete Knight
- Re: Quiet?
- References:
- Quiet?
- From: nib
- Re: Quiet?
- From: Steve Doerr
- Re: Quiet?
- From: rebustion
- Re: Quiet?
- From: Pete Knight
- Re: Quiet?
- From: marc
- Re: Quiet?
- From: Pete Knight
- Quiet?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quiet?
- Next by Date: Re: Quiet?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quiet?
- Next by thread: Re: Quiet?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|