Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- From: bobjanes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:30:41 -0700
On 30 Sep, 10:42, peterchecksfi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The most shocking thing to me about this pic is the harsh lighting &
overall poor quality technically!
I quite agree. However, it seems such things are necessary before a
photograph can be classed as art, and flogged at fancy prices to saps
such as Sir Elton John.
More worrying is the thought that paedophile paronoia is promoting the
idea to children that there is something inherently indecent about
their naked bodies. An attitude of shame that they may well carry with
them for the rest of their lives.
Bob
.
- References:
- Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- From: Hamish
- Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- From: peterchecksfield
- Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- From: peterchecksfield
- Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- From: peterchecksfield
- Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- From: peterchecksfield
- Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- Prev by Date: Re: stick on flip flops
- Next by Date: Re: stick on flip flops
- Previous by thread: Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- Next by thread: Re: Nan Goldin and that picture...
- Index(es):