Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....

Hagar wrote:
"marc" <initial.surname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:FvqdnYx_jMfAKUTbnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxx
Hagar wrote:
"Hagar" <fatmobo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:0xhCi.112175$p7.54921@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dave Roberts" <magpie5212@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:op.txy07nt7ebzcuy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:25:33 +0100, Richard T <r1chardth0rpeNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Snip>>
I guess I'd sum it up that I would want the freedom to go nude anywhere that a textile would want to go in a swimsuit or similar.

How sensible your reply is, thats what most of us want, not the want to go parading around streets naked, not wanting to go to Asda naked, just common sense naturism, not the in your face type that some on here seem to think is the only way forward


By the Way, Duncan Heenan
I still await your reply as to your proof that I am a closet naturist and only go to clubs to show my private parts off to others behind closed doors, your very insulting remark affects not just me but all club members, remember I have put a formal complaint in to BN about your remark, as it is both insulting and slanderous

Oh FFS just when I start having trouble thinking that you can be as stupid as I thought you were, you go and prove that I was mistaken,you are even more stupid!

If you were really going to do anything about your hurt feeling that you reckon Mr Heenan has defamed you would probably know that his remark wasn't slanderous at all. It coudn't be slanderous because he didn't say anything he typed it, that would mean that it may possibly be libellous. The difference between libel and slander is one that confuses many people that babble about it, especially those that have never done anything about protecting their reputation apart from bluster.
As you don't know the difference you probably also don't know that defamation is a civil suit, so that you would have to stump up the money to sue Mr Heenan. Once you have decided that your reputation has been soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince a jury that your reputation was
a) Worth something
b) Damaged.

that's after you had convinced the judge that there was actually a case to answer try looking up "de minimis non curat praetor"

Lets look at a) shall we?


Hagar, has not got an identity that is worth anything, no one knows who you are , no one trusts you.


Now b)


You're a prat, everyone who has ever posted in a thread you have been involved in ( apart from your sock puppets) seems to hold you in some form of contempt. Therefore your reputation as "Hagar" or any of your other indentities is worthless.


If you could find a solicitor, pay a barrister,convince a judge to let the case continue, convince a jury you had a reputation , convince the jury that your reputation had been damaged ,you would be lucky to get away with the decision of scorn that juries give for cases such as these, "Damages of 1 new pence"


I note in a previous reply you skirted around giving an answer, this is because you cant back up you allegation, you are now wide open to legal action my friend, come into my web

posturing popinjay



Hagar Bertie; the Viking

I will not let your remark drop my friend

This is worth watching.




Glad you think so

So Mark like Mr Heenan you think those that go to clubs do so to show off their private parts to others,

Please feel free to post anything that I have posted that suggests that.

how sad you are, probably as sad and
misdirected as Mr. Heenan


Ok, so I said slanderous instead of libellous.,

No you typed it , please try and keep up.


Ok I am a prat,

Thank you, at least we agree on something.




but a prat
with morals and a wish to see naturism thrive for the good of all, not into people faces like Mr. Heenan wishes

You don't wish naturism to thrive into people faces? Is this some sort of new morphing ability? In a few years time can I say "I used to be a naturist, but now I'm a face?


I have a feeling that one of Legion's other persona has grabbed the keyboard again, yesterday's was almost lucid.

And for Mr Heenans benefit, BN did not dismiss it they were most concerned at his remarks and it will be under investigation

Just to keep you as one of Mr. heenans sock puppets informed and up to date.

You do know what a sock puppet is don't you?

You said
If you could find a solicitor, pay a barrister,convince a judge to let the case continue, convince a jury you had a reputation , convince the jury that your reputation had been damaged ,you would be lucky to get away with the decision of scorn that juries give for cases such as these, "Damages of 1 new pence"

I never said I was going to do anything, I said Mr. Heenan could be open to legal action through his remarks, so please get your quotes correct.
ARRRRRWHOOOOOOOPPPPPHAAAAAA !ARRRRRWHOOOOOOOPPPPPHAAAAAA !
REALITY ALERT!REALITY ALERT! THIS NOT A DRILL REALITY ALERT!REALITY ALERT!ARRRRRWHOOOOOOOPPPPPHAAAAAA !ARRRRRWHOOOOOOOPPPPPHAAAAAA !

Everyone in the world at any time "could" be open to legal action....



Though as a prat yourself you will not know this,

Know what?



also Mark who are you,
like me your name means nothing so your credibility goes down the pan also
Ahhh Still smartign from the letter are you, even after all these years?

Oh and by the way you sound even more stupid than me, at least I stand for what I think is moral and just and not self centred in what I alone want
Now do have a bad day my friend as I am having a great one watching you make a complete fool of yourself.


I think you want to put the other Legion back on, the one that doesn't froth at the mouth. Even the Tonelets managed to stick to a house style

Oh by the way if you and Mr.Heenan feel so strongly about the right to go nude wherever you wish, why don't you both lead by example and do it, then you both could expose your parts to all


Feel free to post anything that would show that I have posted here my support for "the right to go nude wherever you wish".
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....
    ... By the Way, Duncan Heenan ... Once you have decided that your reputation has been ... soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....
    ... The difference between libel and slander is one that confuses many people that babble about it, especially those that have never done anything about protecting their reputation apart from bluster. ... Once you have decided that your reputation has been soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince a jury that your reputation was ... Hagar, has not got an identity that is worth anything, no one knows who you are, no one trusts you. ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: Kathleens crack addiction
    ... Defamation actions are based upon damage to reputation within the ... Kathleen defames, probably, at least a dozen or so every day. ... Damages are a necessary element of the action, ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: The Genetics of the British
    ... > "you are the one who claims to be capable of earning big money and having ... Well, there you go, he trades on his reputation as a rich and successful ... Despite a bad heart, a dodgy lung and a nasty cancer, I'm getting pretty ... the kind of character assassination that has been going on here damages ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: "how to" guide to internet libel and anonymous opponents.
    ... > "Defamation protects reputation, no more. ... Words are defamatory if they ... > tend to reduce the reputation of the claimant in the minds of right ... > reputation cannot be damaged much further, and the amount of damages ...
    (uk.local.southwest)
Loading