Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....

Hagar wrote:
"Hagar" <fatmobo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:0xhCi.112175$p7.54921@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dave Roberts" <magpie5212@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:op.txy07nt7ebzcuy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:25:33 +0100, Richard T <r1chardth0rpeNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Snip>>
I guess I'd sum it up that I would want the freedom to go nude anywhere that a textile would want to go in a swimsuit or similar.


How sensible your reply is, thats what most of us want, not the want to go parading around streets naked, not wanting to go to Asda naked, just common sense naturism, not the in your face type that some on here seem to think is the only way forward



By the Way, Duncan Heenan
I still await your reply as to your proof that I am a closet naturist and only go to clubs to show my private parts off to others behind closed doors, your very insulting remark affects not just me but all club members, remember I have put a formal complaint in to BN about your remark, as it is both insulting and slanderous


Oh FFS just when I start having trouble thinking that you can be as stupid as I thought you were, you go and prove that I was mistaken,you are even more stupid!

If you were really going to do anything about your hurt feeling that you reckon Mr Heenan has defamed you would probably know that his remark wasn't slanderous at all. It coudn't be slanderous because he didn't say anything he typed it, that would mean that it may possibly be libellous. The difference between libel and slander is one that confuses many people that babble about it, especially those that have never done anything about protecting their reputation apart from bluster.
As you don't know the difference you probably also don't know that defamation is a civil suit, so that you would have to stump up the money to sue Mr Heenan. Once you have decided that your reputation has been soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince a jury that your reputation was
a) Worth something
b) Damaged.

that's after you had convinced the judge that there was actually a case to answer try looking up "de minimis non curat praetor"

Lets look at a) shall we?


Hagar, has not got an identity that is worth anything, no one knows who you are , no one trusts you.


Now b)


You're a prat, everyone who has ever posted in a thread you have been involved in ( apart from your sock puppets) seems to hold you in some form of contempt. Therefore your reputation as "Hagar" or any of your other indentities is worthless.


If you could find a solicitor, pay a barrister,convince a judge to let the case continue, convince a jury you had a reputation , convince the jury that your reputation had been damaged ,you would be lucky to get away with the decision of scorn that juries give for cases such as these, "Damages of 1 new pence"



I note in a previous reply you skirted around giving an answer, this is because you cant back up you allegation, you are now wide open to legal action my friend, come into my web


posturing popinjay




Hagar Bertie; the Viking

I will not let your remark drop my friend


This is worth watching.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....
    ... If you were really going to do anything about your hurt feeling that you reckon Mr Heenan has defamed you would probably know that his remark wasn't slanderous at all. ... The difference between libel and slander is one that confuses many people that babble about it, especially those that have never done anything about protecting their reputation apart from bluster. ... Once you have decided that your reputation has been soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince a jury that your reputation was ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: Clothesfree petition ends on the 28th....
    ... By the Way, Duncan Heenan ... Once you have decided that your reputation has been ... soooooooo dented that you want to claim damages you will need to convince ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: Kathleens crack addiction
    ... Defamation actions are based upon damage to reputation within the ... Kathleen defames, probably, at least a dozen or so every day. ... Damages are a necessary element of the action, ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: The Genetics of the British
    ... > "you are the one who claims to be capable of earning big money and having ... Well, there you go, he trades on his reputation as a rich and successful ... Despite a bad heart, a dodgy lung and a nasty cancer, I'm getting pretty ... the kind of character assassination that has been going on here damages ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: "how to" guide to internet libel and anonymous opponents.
    ... > "Defamation protects reputation, no more. ... Words are defamatory if they ... > tend to reduce the reputation of the claimant in the minds of right ... > reputation cannot be damaged much further, and the amount of damages ...
    (uk.local.southwest)
Loading