Re: Nothing is "Perfect"



"Peter & Jane" <peter.jane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4e418cc84dpeter.jane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1152020910.397259.151980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Zee <jonZeee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Peter and Jane and Dan.......it is hard to imagine how anyone with
children would choose social nudism as an environment for their
children.......the first thought of a parent should be to consider as
follows.......will our children be put at risk of riducule by peers or
anyone else now or later in life????????????????????? and if the answer
is yes or maybe then the answer is do not go there yet some parents do
not care or are sooooooo stupid to ignore those important
questions.......i think Anna is asking the right questions as a parent
and is considering that nakedness is a part of sex and if the
environment is not perfect then there is only one answer.....the
shopping mall or church or clothed clubs are not perfect but they are
better than the best of nudist environments in protecting the children
from harm and ridicule.....some folks were not intended to be good
responsible parents....hey you three get a life and stop your ignorant
bull*** as it is obvious that you are enslaved to the cult os social
nakedness and your children are of lessor importance......deal with it
you sorry parents...jonZeee

We obviously disagree totally. In addition, is descending to personal
insult your sole mode of discussion? Don't you actually have an argument
of real substance? Pity. Facts and logical points of view provide the
discussions which are most interesting. I simply asked what, in
particular, is bothering the writer I responded to; without that
knowledge I cannot make a relevant answer.

Jane

jonZee has been contributing to rec.nude for years. His theme is always the
same, that nudism is a disreputable thing closely allied to group sex and
incest. Anyone who challenges his assessment is branded a liar, or being in
denial (or probably both). He *claims* to have been a nudist himself and
likes to boast of all the sexual orgies that he says he has seen going on in
various nudist clubs (usually including children). Did I mention that he
thinks that 10 year old girls are "the perfect sexual animal"? or that he
claims to have been the owner of a string of strip-clubs?.

"Anna" on the other hand is just the latest incarnation of someone who has
previously called himself "Max Jefferson", "Jeff Jenson" and "Larry" amongst
other names. He comes from the looney wing of the American far-right. He
also claims to be a nudist himself but is forever worrying about the merest
hint that nudists might also have sex lives, nudism must be "pure" according
to him. He loves to trawl the web looking for news stories with a nudity =
sex theme and then crosspost them to a number of newsgroups with the
intention of getting a flame war going.

The best thing is to ignore them both.

David.


.