Re: That North/South Divide


"Duncan Heenan" <duncanheenan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:440625da$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

":::Jerry::::" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:440612b4$0$49311$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Duncan Heenan" <duncanheenan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4405f130_3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
7
":::Jerry::::" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4404b43f$0$10583$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Duncan Heenan" <duncanheenan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44049a5c$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
":::Jerry::::" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:44048e03$0$49035$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<snip>

What you did was not accidental, and in subsequent posts you
have
admitted
as much in trying to defend your action. The 'it was an
accident'
defence is
a new thought, and a lie.

I hope you can prove that slur?

Of course.


Well post it then, but as you still haven't supplied message ID I
asked for I doubt very much you can prove what I did or didn't
do.

<snip irrelevant rubbish>

<snip at this point as you get the idea>


No I don't, post the message ID were you claim that I sent a second
message unfinished, that is what you accused me off, now either put
up or shut up.

Let me remind, and help, you... This is what you said;
news:44048529$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: That North/South Divide
    ... What you did was not accidental, and in subsequent posts you have ... I hope you can prove that slur? ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: Stupid Imus Controversy
    ... Judaism has nothing to do with race in any case, ... It's not the word itself that's a slur. ...
    (alt.fan.howard-stern)
  • Re: specialization momentum
    ... > much snip ... >> But that is enough criticism. ... intelligence (nor should Peter imagine a slur here)). ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: "ethnic" (was: Re: 22,000 inmates back to the streets)
    ... the phrase to be a slur isn't very effective. ... perfectly acceptable words to use in conversation. ... Again, I think it must not be clear -- I was saying that "ethnic" means everyone, so to imply that it's just Black people or Latinos or Arab people or whatever it was back when you said it (prisoners, so I guess you mostly meant Black people?) wouldn't be as effective a slur as your favored "negro." ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: That North/South Divide
    ... What you did was not accidental, and in subsequent posts you ... I hope you can prove that slur? ... but as you still haven't supplied message ID I ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
Loading