Re: Naturist Law
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:13:25 +0000
On 28 Feb 2006 00:55:07 -0800, "Craig M" <snowmanmagnet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip>
Better, I suppose - but the problem here is that, whatever
might be said in primary legislation, it leaves common law offences
entirely unaffected.
That is simply not true.
Statute law overrides common law.
If the legislation states that it will not be a breach of the peace to
be naked, then you would no longer be able to be arrested for BoP just
for being naked.
This isn't going to happen, of course, but if it did, then that would
be the effect.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
That's inches away from being millimeter perfect.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- References:
- Naturist Law
- From: AndyC
- Re: Naturist Law
- From: Craig M
- Naturist Law
- Prev by Date: Re: This public naturist thing
- Next by Date: Re: That North/South Divide
- Previous by thread: Re: Naturist Law
- Next by thread: To Duncan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
