Re: This public naturist thing

Lisa and David wrote:

"AndyC" <web-email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dtvb1s$e6a$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

":::Jerry::::" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:440326f6$0$5455$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I whole heartedly support you in your attempts to find solutions to
those issues, all I'm saying is that a (no pun intended) blanket
de-restriction on were nudity can be seen / practised would not work.
If there was such a de-restriction, ie. the 'High Street' nude, it
would allow a Perverts Carter - I'm in now way against greater
acceptance of nude leisure etc.

If we (as a society) are going to have rules about nudity, then we should
have rules
about nudity. The law should be clearly defined. But as it stands we (in
effect) have
(technically) complete un-restriction and therefore the restrictions which
are invoked
are arbitrary and based on prejudice alone. This is unfair on both those
who see
nudity as a wholesome and natural state and those who may find it
offensive. I would
prefer it those who dislike nudity would come forward and have the law
changed so that
they can have areas designated as clothing compulsory and free from
nudity. If that
means a total ban on nudity in shopping centres or on a public highway
then I would
agree that it would be a fair trade-off for us to be allowed to otherwise
live our
lives without intervention from those who oppose us.



Well Andy you have a one track mind and seem hell bent on just what you
want!

We will leave this group and not bother with it any more as it is now
obvious to us that it is very biased, we shall indeed not bother with
naturism at all in this country as we do like people like you and your
friends dictating what the country should do just to suit you and a few
others, congratulations you have just lost a naturist couple through your
selfish one minded deeds and actions.

I'm wondering if Lisa and David are for real. That they find this group too
full of views they disagree with is quite possible and unsurprising. But to
decide not to practise naturism "in this country" because they don't like the
newsgroup? Did they practise it already? Do they realise that they can just
go to a suitable beach or club and the likelihood is that no-one they see reads
the newsgroup, let alone contributes?

John

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: This public naturist thing
    ... Lisa and David writes ... naturism at all in this country as we do like people like you and your ... Congratulations upon your success in generating such a long thread in such a short time. ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: Ibiquitys "Gag Order" on engineers
    ... David, it happens every day. ... off their hard'No Country' bias and buy the station. ... perceptuals that told us we were pissing in the wind with Pepsi drinkers. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)
  • Re: Ibiquitys "Gag Order" on engineers
    ... David, it happens every day. ... off their hard'No Country' bias and buy the station. ... perceptuals that told us we were pissing in the wind with Pepsi drinkers. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)
  • Re: Nikon shifts production to China. CHINA!
    ... David J Taylor added these comments in the current discussion du ... This isn't a cheap shot at your country, ... "Recession is when your neighbor is laid off. ... President Andrew Shepherd in the movie ?The American President? ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Andrew Welch again
    ... So you are saying that what Duncan says is Gospel, ... Sorry David but I do not take a persons word as gospel so we will agree to ... How do you know your feet do not smell! ... Either way who are the majority and do they want public naturism on the ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)