Re: BN website
- From: ":::Jerry::::" <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:22:02 -0000
"AndyC" <AndyC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dm7cl5$8j6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
<snip>
>
> It seems blatantly obvious to me that the BN site should be
updateable directly by BN.
> If this was the case it could be done at no cost (apart from the
time taken) which
> could be incorporated into an employees pay or the job itself could
be incorporated
> into the CM's responsibilities.
Indeed, but that doesn't mean you don't need to retain some form of
maintenance contract for the backend, *server side*, part of the
site.
However, I am told that BN want to "make money" out of
> the site, or at least recover some of the costs that they have
already incurred.
>
That is not unreasonable, ISTM that some are just after free
advertising for their commercial interests, what say you Andy?...
--
Regards, Jerry.
Location - United Kingdom.
In the first instance please reply to group,
Email to the quoted address is deleted unread.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BN website
- From: AndyC
- Re: BN website
- References:
- BN website
- From: Duncan Heenan
- Re: BN website
- From: Rik
- Re: BN website
- From: Steve Doerr
- Re: BN website
- From: Tim Forcer
- Re: BN website
- From: Steve Doerr
- Re: BN website
- From: AndyC
- Re: BN website
- From: Steve Doerr
- Re: BN website
- From: AndyC
- Re: BN website
- From: Steve Doerr
- Re: BN website
- From: AndyC
- BN website
- Prev by Date: Re: BN website
- Next by Date: Re: Good news AND Bad news from the ENSC - follow up
- Previous by thread: Re: BN website
- Next by thread: Re: BN website
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|