Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- From: Suzanne Piper <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:50:01 GMT
Rik wrote:
Well in the past they have acted on a vague letter complaining about what another person said at a regional meeting. The first that person knew about the complaint was when they recived a letter telling them that a complaint (no details) had been made (no details of person) and that the person concerned had been found guilty (without having any chance to defend themselves) and that they were being given a caution and that any further complaints would lead to their membership being removed. Oh and the convicted person could appeal!On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:19:04 +0100, "Duncan Heenan" <duncanheenan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have done quite the opposite of keeping my wishes secret - it is detailed plans that I'm not prepared to hand over!
But you said "No, I am an ordinary member, speaking on a public newsgroup, I am not going to give you my ideas." I don't think anyone's asking for detailed plans but just broad brush view of ideas which go a bit beyond sack everyone and start again.
It may be BN, but it is run exactly like' the upper echelons of some dubious political party in an unstable country where you have to be careful what you say and who you say it to.'
LOL. Well I'll bow to your superior knowledge but it's not clear to me what you think will happen if you divulge your plans. Will they shoot you?
Rik
This is true because several people on this newsgroup have seen the paperwork. The person concerned was rigorously defended by other people at that meeting, but to no avail. Solicitors and the individuals letter did not receive a response.
Suzanne
www.shabden.co.uk
.
- References:
- Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- From: Duncan Heenan
- Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- From: Commercial Manager
- Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- From: Duncan Heenan
- Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- From: Rik
- Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- From: Duncan Heenan
- Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- From: Rik
- Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- Prev by Date: Re: What to do about BN?
- Next by Date: Re: What to do about BN?
- Previous by thread: Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- Next by thread: Re: Andrew Welch's response [Part 2]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading