Re: OT: Sipson down

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:37:32 +0000, Mick Whittingham
<Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <c32vm41fmra0fl345kv7q1h79vno0mrd25@xxxxxxx>, Andy Bonwick
<nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:41:21 +0000, Mick Whittingham
<Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

snip>

3/ If more London air capacity is needed then expanding Luton or
Stansted would be more use to more people north of London as well. South
and west are catered for with Heathrow and Gatwick.

Isn't having good connecting flights to other parts of the globe one
of the main functions of an international airport? I'm not sure that
40 flights per day to Tenerife counts for much when it comes to this
consideration.

I'm not sure of your point there. I maybe being thick but the next 40+
flights from Gatwick as of is posting are all but a few short haul.

18:00 BE949 JERSEY AIRBORNE 1821 South Terminal

snip>

Well done.

Now do the same for Luton and Stansted but cut out holiday
destinations and budget airlines.

When I said other parts of the globe I didn't really mean short haul
either.

.

Relevant Pages
Loading