Re: Back on the horse
- From: Phil Launchbury <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:51:37 +0000
In article <2vack4t78u2eg5l140ugv7op8p989q5vsg@xxxxxxx>, Ace wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:01:04 +0000, Champ <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All metals are detectable, although some less than others. It's the
conductivity, rather than magneticity[1], that makes the difference,
as it's a "disturbance" to the electromagnetic field, inducing a
current, that is used in these machines.
<Obvious feed-line>
Eddies in the space-time continuum?
Phil
--
Phil Launchbury, IT PHB
'I'm training the bats that live in my cube
to juggle mushrooms'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Back on the horse
- From: Ace
- Re: Back on the horse
- From: Eddie
- Re: Back on the horse
- References:
- Back on the horse
- From: Champ
- Re: Back on the horse
- From: Tosspot
- Re: Back on the horse
- From: Champ
- Re: Back on the horse
- From: Tosspot
- Re: Back on the horse
- From: Champ
- Re: Back on the horse
- From: Ace
- Back on the horse
- Prev by Date: Re: Paging the LoveFilm users
- Next by Date: Re: Biker Down
- Previous by thread: Re: Back on the horse
- Next by thread: Re: Back on the horse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|