Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: "John B" <jbilberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2008 11:42:26 GMT
Bear wrote:
In article <rZadnb8ehfH6prbUnZ2dnUVZ8trinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Simon
Gates says...
Bear wrote:
In article <vedmi492i2i6dd5ods44lva1g7biae3o7l@xxxxxxx>, Colin
Irvine says...
On 24 Nov 2008 22:59:36 GMT, Lozzo squeezed out the following:
Simon Gates wrote:(borrowing) >> spend,
Along with the leverage of a ?100bn extra government
He said 'leverage' - when do we get to kill him?
He used it as a noun, which is perfectly correct. It's when it's
used as a verb that the knives need to come out.
I don't care whether it's "correct" or not - a line has to be
drawn, and that word is it :)
'leverage' is a perfectly acceptable word in economics.
I don't care, really.
Who cares what they say to that?
They're all total cunts.
G. B. Shaw said it very well: "If all the economists in the world were
laid end to end, they still would not reach a conclusion."
--
John B
.
- References:
- OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Wicked Uncle Nigel
- Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Champ
- Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Simon Gates
- Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Lozzo
- Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Colin Irvine
- Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Bear
- Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Simon Gates
- Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- From: Bear
- OT: Well that's killed...
- Prev by Date: Re: Four coppers down
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] DVD to something else.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Well that's killed...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|