Re: MythTV VS TopupTV




"TD" <topper.doggle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:g2ptrq$7kv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2008-06-11, Doki <mrdoki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"TD" <topper.doggle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g2p7mv$cs8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2008-06-11, Doki <mrdoki@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've spotted a TopupTV PVR thing in the supermarket at £80, which is made
by
Thomson. I've also got a Compaq PC which I was planning to make into a
MythTV box (IIRC it's a P4 1.7 with 512 megs of RAM). By my reckoning,
it's
going to cost around £80-100 to get that working as a MythTV machine, as
I'll need a Hauppage 350 and a videocard with S-video out, unless I can
scrounge one, along with a linux compatable Wifi card for it.


No. You don't need a 350 - any DVB-R PCI card that works with Linux will
do.
Why do you need s-video out - what display device will you be using on the
frontend? Also, why the WiFi? How are you going to set up the network?

Is the 350 not *the* twin tuner DVB card that works with linux? The TopupTV
thing is twin tuner.

No. It's an old POS. http://mythtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_PVR-350
Have a look at http://tinyurl.com/6fl79q. You can gauge compatibility via
judicious searching of http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page and
searching the web for the card model and Linux.

I have a couple of these: http://tinyurl.com/5ujqhj. They work fine, see
http://tinyurl.com/53thzc. I don't think they made dual-tuner PCI cards when
I set my box up.

If you want twin tuners on one card, you could try http://tinyurl.com/47gbqk,
which is well supported (see http://tinyurl.com/2unn68).

Wifi so that I can access music and films over the network. Manually
transferring everything to IDE hard drives is not really a practical option
for me. Network would run through SAMBA would it not?

That's fair enough. You only need Samba if you want to access stuff directly
from the filesystem, using Windows networking. Myth has its own networking
infrastructure, assuming that (a) what you want to access is imported into (or
recorded by) Myth, and (b) you have the Myth frontend installed on all client
machines.

Most important question - what OS will you be running on the frontend (client)
machines? If Windows, see http://tinyurl.com/56bmzm.

Thinking of a combined front and back box under the telly. All the other machines in the house will be windows, hence samba.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: able to ping, unable to browse
    ... The thing is that I have placed the card into other machines ... on our network and it worked straight away. ... configuration as some of the other machines such as service packs etc. ... > What is your primary DNS settings? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: IC lost after changing to a 100Meg Network ~ Switcher problem?
    ... The 192.168.1.1 NIC should have no default gateway; ... and the other machines should all have 192.168.1.1 as a default gateway. ... > A second card in the machine connects to my other networked ... > network card was a10Meg connected to a 10 Meg switcher running the ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: able to ping, unable to browse
    ... I am trying to connect to my windows network without any luck, ... servers on our network and the card worked fine. ... configuration as some of the other machines such as service packs etc. ... Does it point to a DNS server running ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: Intel Pro 100 network card glitch
    ... > Networking under Task Manager you will see something like 1% Network ... The machines with onboard VIA NICs have ... > machine that has done it has so far had a Intel Pro card. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Intel Pro 100 network card glitch
    ... We have a number of machines with this card, ... Networking under Task Manager you will see something like 1% Network ... However, unplug the cable, then plug it back ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)