Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: darsy <darsyx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:11:40 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 27, 3:21 pm, Lady Nina <spamtr...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:58:22 -0800 (PST), darsy <dar...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Feb 27, 2:52 pm, Lady Nina <spamtr...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:28:59 -0000, "Alex Ferrier" <x...@xxx> wrote:
ginge wrote:
There are parts of science we fully understand, can measure, and in
those areas I agree with you - but there are also the parts that we
don't fully understand, where only theories exist. Those parts aren't
really all that dissimilar to religion.
Oh yes they bloody well are.
If science doesn't fully understand a phenomenon it sets about through
research and testing to to discover a repeatable, verifiable solution
to the unknowns within that phenomenon. Religion does not.
"no matter how honest scientists think they are, they are still
influenced by various unconscious assumptions that prevent them from
attaining true objectivity."
you've just confused "science" with "scientist" again.
Wilson may have. [1] I didn't. However science does not happen without
scientists and the above applies.
au contraire. Someone made a comment about science, and you replied
with a quote about scientists. I maintain you've confused the two.
--
d.
.
- References:
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: Colin Irvine
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: Champ
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: Iridium
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: ginge
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: Champ
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: ginge
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: Alex Ferrier
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: Lady Nina
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: darsy
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- From: Lady Nina
- Re: OT Funeral readings
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Funeral readings
- Next by Date: Re: OT Funeral readings
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Funeral readings
- Next by thread: Re: OT Funeral readings
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading