Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Champ <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:44:08 +0000
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:02:45 +0000, Paul Corfield
<aooy65@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:36:57 +0000, ogden <ogden@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Champ wrote:
The are serious discussions about removing the restriction on using
phones on planes, because a) it's widely flouted anyway (mostly by
accident) and b) doesn't seem to be causing any accidents.
Regardless of the safety aspects, I'd happily have the things banned on
trains, let alone aircraft.
Nothing worse than listening to business people on trains yacking on and
on and bloody on about how self important they are and bossing their
underlings around.
It may well appear that way to you, but one of the supposed advantages
of travelling by train is the ability to work. Seeing as my job
pretty much consists of communicating with other people, using the
phone is a significant part of it.
--
Champ
ZX10R | GPz750turbo | GSX-R 600 racer
My advice as your attorney is to buy a motorcycle
To email me, neal at my domain should work.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Tosspot
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Paul Corfield
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: platypus
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- References:
- 777 crash analysis
- From: Dave Emerson
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Molly
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Des
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Molly
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: ts
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Champ
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: ogden
- Re: 777 crash analysis
- From: Paul Corfield
- 777 crash analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: ebay help needed
- Next by Date: Re: BOSM 08 19th April - first call
- Previous by thread: Re: 777 crash analysis
- Next by thread: Re: 777 crash analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading