Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Colin Irvine <Colin.Irvine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:25:25 +0100
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:21:50 +0100, Higgins
<the.best.names.are.gone@xxxxxxxxx> squeezed out the following:
Ace wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:12:04 +0100, Colin Irvine
<Colin.Irvine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:02:17 +0100, Higgins
<the.best.names.are.gone@xxxxxxxxx> squeezed out the following:
Champ wrote:You weren't to know. But the clue that I knew what I was tallking
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:17:58 +0100, HigginsDouble damn.
<the.best.names.are.gone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Colin Irvine wrote:<something>
Is the wrong answer.er, John, I don't think it's wise to pick an argument with an
accountant on this subject.
about was the law case - and you missed it!
To be fair, the clue that he knew *** all about what he spoke of was
there from his very first post. Why he then felt able to argue the
toss I don't know ...
I believe it's a tradition around these parts.
Absolutely - long may it continue!
--
Colin Irvine
YZF1000R BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5
http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
.
- References:
- [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Krusty
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: NickNoxx
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Higgins
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Colin Irvine
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Higgins
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Champ
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Higgins
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Colin Irvine
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Ace
- Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- From: Higgins
- [OT] My First Property Development.
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- Next by Date: Re: Father down
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] My First Property Development.
- Index(es):
Loading