Re: Company bikes, a little summary

Tim <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

In message <82ps3dfq2z.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Timo Geusch
<tnewsSPAMMENOT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes

No, I hadn't talked to Wik about this despite Adie giving me some
contact details. Instead I emailed my accountant, who came up with a
spread*** and some advice.

Basically, it seems to be more advantageous to have a company bike if
you do relatively few miles and have high repair costs (based on buying
a fairly cheap bike like my K1100LT). The more miles you do the more you
seem to gain by charging your company the mileage instead. With the
fairly high mileage I do, I'm around the crossover point where it's
better to not have a company bike. In my case, said point was around the
17k/year mark.

Until some H&S person decides that it is "forbidden" to use bikes on
company business.

The trouble with talking to my H&S person is that it awfully looks like
I'm talking to myself...

--
Morini Corsaro 125 | CB450K4 | XL250 Motosport x2 | 900SSD | VFR750
Triumph T-Bird chop | K1100LT | CB400/4 BOTAFOF #33 TWA#10
The UKRM FAQ: http://www.ukrm.net/faq/index.html
"Je profite du paysage" - Joe Bar
.

Quantcast