Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- From: steve auvache <dont_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:20:33 +0100
In article <JILL94.3xG.B.midge@xxxxxxxxxx>, M J Carley
<ensmjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
In the referenced article, steve auvache <dont_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In article <JIL9CB.51s.B.midge@xxxxxxxxxx>, M J Carley
<ensmjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
You do need descent. Without a vertical component of velocity, you
have no lift because your angle of attack is zero, if you choose a
rational reference for angle of attack.
You still don't get it do you. In the case of a wing, the angle of
attack is that of the surface relative to the direction of travel of
the whole mass of the thing through the air and not to the land/water
over which it is moving and just to complicate matters if you want
lift is some positive angle of a few degrees.
That's what I said.
No you didn't.
No. In a vertical dive, the lift acts horizontally and the drag
vertically (up). Opening a randomly selected aerodynamics textbook:
In a vertical dive/climb there is no lift, which is why I
specifically choose the examples. If there were the craft would start
to drift from the vertical.
For a symmetric wing.
No. It is good for any wing which is set to produce zero lift,
regardless of profile. A highly cambered wing from a sailplane at 4 or
5 degrees negative AoA would do the same as a symmetrical wing at zero
degrees.
--
steve auvache
A Bloo one with built in safety features
.
- References:
- Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- From: toad
- Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- From: steve auvache
- Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- From: M J Carley
- Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- From: steve auvache
- Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- From: M J Carley
- Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- Next by Date: Re: (OT And Years Too Late) LoTR II
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- Next by thread: Re: OT: FOAK Windmill Boat/Cart
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|