Re: [OT] FOAK: Libel
- From: "Cab" <my_email_address_is_in_my_sig@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:25:40 +0100
Krusty wrote:
Is it true that preceeding a statement about a company with the word
"allegedly" protects you from a libel case, or have I been watching
too much HIGNFY?
I'm about to launch a website in an attempt to cost a company as much
lost business as possible, but as they're extremely litigious, I'm a
tad concerned about covering my arse. All of the information I'm
including is true, but not all of it can be proven, iyswim.
As Molly said, there's an intent to do damage. Also, the onus will be
on you to prove the statements that you make are true.
This is what happened to the McLibel bods.
--
Cab :^) - argue's like a girl
GSX 1400 - For Sale http://www.rosbif.org/forsale.html
UKRMMA#10 (KOTL), IbW#015, BoB#4, POTM#3, SKA#1
email addy : ukrm_dot_cab_at_rosbif_dot_org
UKRM Firefox Extension: http://www.rosbif.org/ukrm/ukrm.xpi
The gingeometer: http://www.rosbif.org/ukrm/gingeometer/
.
- References:
- [OT] FOAK: Libel
- From: Krusty
- [OT] FOAK: Libel
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: DVD Recorder recommendations
- Next by Date: Bearing in mind
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] FOAK: Libel
- Next by thread: [OT] FOAK (again): Damp Patches.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
