Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: "Brownz \(mobile\)" <someone.not@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:21:20 GMT
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote:
Brownz (mobile) wrote:
Christofire wrote:
Well, congratulations and coconuts to those who said the car would
be fine. Although the source is, well, the sun, BMW have said:
"There is no fault that could have contributed to his actions."
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006120809,,00.html
So, ban and jail or a slap on the wrists?
Like I thought at the time, attention seeking *** that wanted to get
his mug in the papers.
Take his car license away and force the twat on to a honda melody for
the rest of his life.
Did you see the wanker on a daytime telly prog recently? Bawling his
eyes out because of the "trauma", his psychologist next to him
patting him on the shoulder...
Si
Thankfully, no.
I think if I had it may have pushed me into taking up a "predator" style
stalk, trap and disposal mission.
--
Cheerz - Brownz
http://www.brownz.org/
.
- References:
- OT: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Christofire
- Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Brownz \(mobile\)
- Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot
- OT: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- Prev by Date: OT:ping the NSLU2 experts
- Next by Date: OT Call me Rope.
- Previous by thread: Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- Next by thread: Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- Index(es):
Loading