Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: steve auvache <dont_spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:08:23 +0000
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot wrote
Brownz (mobile) wrote:
Christofire wrote:
Well, congratulations and coconuts to those who said the car would be
fine. Although the source is, well, the sun, BMW have said:
"There is no fault that could have contributed to his actions."
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2006120809,,00.html
So, ban and jail or a slap on the wrists?
Like I thought at the time, attention seeking *** that wanted to get
his mug in the papers.
Take his car license away and force the twat on to a honda melody for
the rest of his life.
Did you see the wanker on a daytime telly prog recently? Bawling his eyes
out because of the "trauma", his psychologist next to him patting him on the
shoulder...
I didn't. I am steadfastly refusing to learn anything about the
subject, just on the off chance I get called for jury service.
--
steve auvache
one step closer to The Perfect Date.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Grimly Curmudgeon
- Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot
- Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- References:
- OT: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Christofire
- Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Brownz \(mobile\)
- Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- From: Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot
- OT: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- Prev by Date: Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- Next by Date: Re: news server
- Previous by thread: Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- Next by thread: Re: Runaway BMW has "no fault"
- Index(es):
Loading