Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: Champ <news@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:31:29 +0000
On 27 Feb 2006 04:19:06 -0800, "darsy" <sillygoogle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Champ wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:21:36 -0000, Bear <bastardDOTbear@xxxxxxxxx>[Range Rovers]
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:02:40 +0000, Champ said ...
Oh. I detest them all, and think nothing screams "I've got money but
no style" louder.
Rubbish. They're a design classic
Sorry. My mistake. Thanks for the correction.
you may already have made this connection yourself, but I suspect that
you despise Range Rovers because of the sort of people they're
associated with: the Royal Family, the aristocracy, and other
criminals.
I'm aware that this is almost certainly a factor.
For the record, I'd love a Range Rover. Though I'd prefer a double-cab
110 Landie with a winch and snorkel and checkerplate load bay.
But I dislike 'working' 4x4s too.
--
Champ
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: darsy
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- References:
- OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: Wicked Uncle Nigel
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: FrJack @ work
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: JB
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: Champ
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: JB
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: Champ
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: Bear
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: Champ
- Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- From: darsy
- OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: One for the wine lovers
- Next by Date: Re: OT & FOAK: Browser page expiry
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- Next by thread: Re: OT: FOAK: Range Rovers
- Index(es):