Re: twat
- From: raden <raden@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:31:24 GMT
In message <MPG.1e5c27bf51525883989deb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bear <bastardDOTbear@xxxxxxxxx> writes
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:20:48 +0000, Andy Bonwick said ...Well he loves meOn Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:09:26 -0000, Bear <bastardDOTbear@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:53:47 +0000, Andy Bonwick said ...
>> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:41:00 GMT, "PAUL MOORE"
>> <pm007r3230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> snip>
>> >
>> >Please try and grow up , and dont be obvious
>> >
>> Anyone else had e-mails from this ***?
>
>No. I feel a bit left out.
Perhaps you weren't abusive enough. Have another go but get a bit more
personal this time.
No way. If he can't be arsed to make the effort then I'm not giving him
a second chance.
-------------------------------------
"raden, sarcasm seems to be a theme in your responses.
Yes, original post was deleted due to a grammatical error but obviously not quickly enough
Why don't you try alt.comedy.standup or alt.twats.iam "
-----------------------------------------
.... and he's changed his name to raden123@hotmail
sweet ...
--
geoff
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: twat
- From: Bear
- Re: twat
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Negative scanning
- Next by Date: Re: PRS licences
- Previous by thread: Re: twat
- Next by thread: Re: twat
- Index(es):
Loading