Re: OT: That surname site...



dwb wrote:

> So who has the rarest name then?
>
> (http://www.spatial-literacy.org/UCLnames/Surnames.aspx) for those who
> haven't done it yet.
>
> There's apparently a 1 in 3 million chance of being struck by
> lightning, and an 18 in 3 million chance of meeting someone with my
> surname (if that site is to be believed).
>
> Anyone beat 6 / per million? (Someone I know, who doesn't post here,
> has 2!).

Pah!, all I got was..

"There were no results found for your selection. There needed to be at least
100 people with the name on the Electoral Register in 1998 to be in the
database. We are hoping to add these missing names at a later date."

As far as I know, there are less than 20 of us.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: That surname site...
    ... dwb wrote: ... > So who has the rarest name then? ... and an 18 in 3 million chance of meeting someone with my ... Full throttle for 55 minutes - a hell of a buzz. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: OT: That surname site...
    ... >So who has the rarest name then? ... and an 18 in 3 million chance of meeting someone with my ... Apparently I'm in the most unlikely of locations to have my surname. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: OT: That surname site...
    ... >So who has the rarest name then? ... and an 18 in 3 million chance of meeting someone with my ... >surname. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • OT: That surname site...
    ... So who has the rarest name then? ... There's apparently a 1 in 3 million chance of being struck by ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: OT: That surname site...
    ... >>dwb wrote: ... >>> So who has the rarest name then? ... > my old surname doesn't exist either. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)