Re: Paging the rucksackisti
- From: "someone here" <16-3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:40:14 GMT
"Elly" <elly@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tsocr1dhp1ph2v1cul9d13kum8b20hub2f@xxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
>
> b) Is the price of these purely a reflection of the Karrimor name
> (they're about £150) or should I be budgeting this of amount for a
> rucksack with these kind of features?
The Karrimor quality was absolute.
My old rucksack is now twenty years old and £30. (Expensive at the time)
and is still good for two or three camping trips a year.
So on a pound per trip basis, it paid for itself after 5 years and is still
going strong.
Replaced the belt with a snap fit, replaced the zip in the top pocket.
My brother had a 'cheap' rucksack which lasted two years then was beyond
repair.
Try and get to an outdoors shop to 'see' the differences. It also helps to
try the different
frames for size and fit.
YMMV
Dave
.
- References:
- OT: Paging the rucksackisti
- From: Elly
- OT: Paging the rucksackisti
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Paging the Car Audioisti
- Next by Date: Re: Ebay - what a heap of crap
- Previous by thread: Re: Paging the rucksackisti
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Paging the rucksackisti
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|