Re: Equipotential bonding
- From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 02 Jan 2009 11:28:00 +0000 (GMT)
In article <EtWdnYpt9rRyfMDUnZ2dnUVZ8sTinZ2d@xxxxxx>,
beamends <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:56:41 +0000, Lester Caine wrote:
So having a clean 0V reference makes perfect sense to me, with a
nice quiet +24V supply in my case to take load off the DCC feeds.
0V is a tested connection to physical earth, it has a specific meaning
when wiring panels, transformers etc.
Maybe that's what 0V means in the US when talking about mains wiring.
But in this (UK) group and in the context of model trains, it doesn't
mean anything of the kind.
0V in this context just means the nominal baseline against which other
voltages (in the low voltage system) are quoted. It may or may not be
earthed inside the mains power supply, but there is no need to earth
it separately.
Indeed in some systems with multiple power supply rails, a rail other
than the nominal 0V may be earthed inside the PSU although I would
expect most model railway systems to avoid that - since in such a
setup a naive user who earths the 0V output PSU terminal effectively
shorts out the PSU.
(Assuming of course you're using reputable equipment!)
--
Ian Jackson personal email: <ijackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
These opinions are my own. http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ijackson/
PGP2 key 1024R/0x23f5addb, fingerprint 5906F687 BD03ACAD 0D8E602E FCF37657
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Equipotential bonding
- From: beamends
- Re: Equipotential bonding
- References:
- Re: Equipotential bonding
- From: beamends
- Re: Equipotential bonding
- Prev by Date: Re: Equipotential bonding
- Next by Date: Re: Equipotential bonding
- Previous by thread: Re: Equipotential bonding
- Next by thread: Re: Equipotential bonding
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading