Re: Latest poll...
- From: "Geezer" <hillboy4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:35:52 -0000
"Wm..." <tcnw71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oMdXYVJ1677DFwb3@[127.0.0.1]...
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:05:21uk.rec.humour
<43efb08c$0$6355$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> uk.rec.humour
Geezer <hillboy4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Wm..." <tcnw71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qn6ni4Uqjn7DFw4d@[127.0.0.1]...
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:29:13
<43ed132a$0$64364$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
meGeezer <hillboy4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Wm..." <tcnw71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mL2kpfNd296DFwzg@[127.0.0.1]...
Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:50:45
Hmmm, not at all sure why this should be taken to e-mail. Seemed to
unexpectedI made a normal sort of comment for the group and it hit an
Er...you are confusing me now. Yes, I replied to your email, but did notplace.Simply because I dont see the need to share it.
Presuming (once again) you were the person that sent me an e-mail you
should have a response.
I'll try to say something humorous while noticing you didn't bother.
While attempting to be humorous
A man made someone furious
He mailed a reply
We don't know why
The exchange seems mildly curious
email you first.
Weird. I wonder who sent you an e-mail in my name? From my end it is
apparent you sent me an e-mail and I replied to it. I am boring enough
to keep logs of such things. I wonder which of us is wrong?
Only two possible answers to that. So I will answer with number 1, assuming
that you are wrong and did indeed email me first. Answer number two (knowing
that I didnt email you first) will be on the assumption that somebody
unknown is taking the time and trouble to impersonate me, or you...as you
seem to think.
1) That is "troll" speak I think, you want to be careful...you will get a
reputation. We both know who is wrong. You seem to be concerned that some
may think you e-mailed me first...cant imagine why that would be. Or maybe
you see it as losing face...only you know. As for me, if I e-mailed you
first there is no reason for me to deny it, *I* know that.
2) Yeah it is weird isnt it? Well my end tells me something different...but
I dont bother keeping logs. I can only imagine you are important enough for
somebody to bother pretending to be you. As for me, my employment has a bit
of status to it, and there may well be some who would like to pull the
carpet from under me...they do keep trying. As I like my job very much I
defend it as best I can, but you never know whats around the corner. But
online I doubt it very much, I'm not important enough for anybody to go to
such lengths.
Logs available on request for about 30 days.
1) Nah...I dont see why I would be remotely interested in what you want me
to have said.
2) Thats very kind of you to offer...but if somebody wants to send e-mails
in my name...then so be it. I dont really care...the days of worrying about
how I might be perceived are gone...and was a mistake to ever worry about it
in the first place...still, you live and learn. As Eminem would say "I yam
whatever you say I yam, if not, then why would I say I yam?!" Good song
that...you heard it? I recommend the album...well wicked! lol.
And am just replying to your reply to mine as we
"speak"...erm...still following this?
Are you Peter or not?
1) Yep...thats me...who are you? No secret in knowing my real name...it has
been mentioned a few times in here and wouldnt take you long to find it out,
if you didnt remember it already. Want my date of birth too? Thats been
mentioned in here in the past as well.
2) Yes I am. So they used my e-mail addy and my name did they? How sly of
them.
As you brought it in here...are you claiming that I emailed you first?
Yes, or if you didn't you got what I said in reply so it must have been
someone that knew your private e-mail address. (I am not so rude a
person as to say what it was).
1) Hardly private...its clearly visable in here.
2) Er...same answer really, but thanks for you concern on revealing my
private stuff, you really are such a caring person.
you
Wm...are you really that worried what others think? Trust me...it gets
nowhere.
No, I am a bit concerned that someone else might be using and know your
private e-mail address. If you didn't e-mail me then you ought to be
aware that someone else is using your address.
1) I cant see why they would...and I think you should be aware that somebody
is using yours...apparently.
2) Again, same answer.
If you send me an e-mail (the reply-to address works) I will tell you
what you said, or what someone else said on your behalf.
1) Nah! The last email I sent you was last night...I cant be bothered to
waste anymore of my time on this. I wont reply to you if you e-mail me back
either...I dont like to ignore people so consider this your reply, to
whatever you say by e-mail or in here. Those that know me...know me...and
know that I dont go shouting about e-mails I get, unlike you. They also know
you brought it back in here, not me. I like most people in here, and think
this nonsense has no place in a group like this.And it also isnt my thing.
2) Thank you again, very kind of you to offer...but as it wasnt sent by me I
aint interested in it.
very
Oh I dont know...I think a few found what I said humourous...or at the
1) Now that actually made me laugh...well done! But I decline the offer of aleast enjoyed it.
Ahhh, a poem...that I can do! Badly maybe...but its been a while...
You claim not to see,
your attack on me,
and pretend that no malice was meant.
Its clearly out of place,
an attempt to save face,
but the message, was clearly sent.
But I have no reason,
even in this season,
to worry what others think.
So just be you,
and be true,
or you will look like you really do stink.
OK, I think that was crap, but you tried. Have a hug.
hug...I only hug people that are honest with me.
2) Awww fanks...I'm sorry you didnt like the poem, but glad you saw the
effort I made. Hug right back atcha!
Again, apologies to all...but I hope you found it as entertaining as I
did...for a brief while :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Wm...
- Re: Latest poll...
- References:
- Latest poll...
- From: Geezer
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Wm...
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Geezer
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Wm...
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Geezer
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Wm...
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Geezer
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Wm...
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Geezer
- Re: Latest poll...
- From: Wm...
- Latest poll...
- Prev by Date: Re: One for the ladies in the group
- Next by Date: Re: One for the ladies in the group
- Previous by thread: Re: Latest poll...
- Next by thread: Re: Latest poll...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|