Re: I'm back!
- From: "Wm..." <tcnw41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:14:34 +0100
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:23:02 <dbf3q5$oig$15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> uk.rec.humour Geordie the Forgery <geordie4567@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Wm..." <tcnw41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:tyJqFEXXrr2CFwUY@[127.0.0.1]...Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:55:52 <0phkd19taameucl5fqgl61mmt5dtf7bsvp@xxxxxxx> uk.rec.humour Martin <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
It wasn't until after the cremation that they realised he might have been shamming :-)
Reminds me of some of my relatives. Won't explain why, just saying it touched me.
Incest is illegal! :-)
But should it be?
OK, that may not appear funny.
The way I see it the UK laws about incest were introduced because top knobs were inbreeding and the ears and noses of the royal family would get bigger and bigger and eventually become an embarrassment to the nation.
Fortunately Princess Di chose to have at least one of her children by another man. I do think she could have chosen a better man. But, I suppose, she wasn't famous for her brain.
-- Wm ... Reply-To: address valid for at least 7 days from date of posting .
- References:
- Re: I'm back!
- From: AndrewEllis
- Re: I'm back!
- From: Andrea
- Re: I'm back!
- From: Geordie the Forgery
- Re: I'm back!
- From: Andrea
- Re: I'm back!
- From: Wm...
- Re: I'm back!
- From: Geordie the Forgery
- Re: I'm back!
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad taste maybe...
- Next by Date: Re: NEW WORDS FOR 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: I'm back!
- Next by thread: Re: I'm back!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|