Re: Tree sap question
- From: nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Nick Maclaren)
- Date: 28 Feb 2008 21:24:37 GMT
In article <8t8es397lkfjhchsjdanl6igt4qeg5jmqf@xxxxxxx>,
Chris Hogg <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
|>
|> PS: Just found this on wikipedia, for what it's worth.
|> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohesion-tension_theory
That's what the books had, and they waved their metaphorical hands
equally vigorously while spouting comparable platitudes. Doubtless
someone has put some mathematics around that, though it may be
pretty dubious, but I have not seen it.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tree sap question
- From: Charlie Pridham
- Re: Tree sap question
- References:
- Tree sap question
- From: Broadback
- Re: Tree sap question
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Tree sap question
- From: ®óñ© © ²°¹°-°²
- Re: Tree sap question
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Tree sap question
- From: ®óñ© © ²°¹°-°²
- Re: Tree sap question
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Tree sap question
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Tree sap question
- Prev by Date: Best way to lawn grass
- Next by Date: Win an 'About Trees' kit - gardenandgreen.co.uk
- Previous by thread: Re: Tree sap question
- Next by thread: Re: Tree sap question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|