Re: Access via Google
- From: Sacha <sacha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:37:21 +0000
On 10/3/07 12:21, in article
1173529277.507875.135420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "La Puce"
<helene@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10 Mar, 12:03, "judith.le...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<judith.le...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for all the information Mike. I have received a letter this
morning which confirms that I won't have to killfile one person in urg
anymore as she has been ORDERED not to write in any way, shape or form
on a public group, anything libellious or inflammatory about me.
What? I can write what I want and when I want. You however cannot.
I've seen Sacha's letter and it's laughable. And if you mention, as
you've been told, my husband and my organisation once more, this will
then be more serious than you would have ever expected.
I don't think your 'colleague' as you grandly refer to the senior director
of URBED London, considered it a laughing matter. His reply to me indicated
as much. Try it on once more with me and I'll have a lawyer onto you for
harassment so fast, it will make your eyes water.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Access via Google
- From: david
- Re: Access via Google
- References:
- Access via Google
- From: Dave Hill
- Re: Access via Google
- From: La Puce
- Re: Access via Google
- From: Dave Hill
- Re: Access via Google
- From: judith.lea99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Access via Google
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: Access via Google
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: Access via Google
- From: judith.lea99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Access via Google
- From: La Puce
- Access via Google
- Prev by Date: Re: Access via Google
- Next by Date: Re: Access via Google
- Previous by thread: Re: Access via Google
- Next by thread: Re: Access via Google
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|