Re: hosepipe ban on for a year!!!
- From: echinosum <echinosum.2dechg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:32:05 +0100
EagleEyes Wrote:
I particularly like the last bit
"The German-owned company is also the country's MOST WASTEFUL water
firm, haemorrhaging 196million gallons of water every day - the
equivalent of 350 Olympic-sized swimming pools.
Last month regulator Ofwat came under fire for REFUSING TO FINE Thames
Water for its failure to meet leakage targets in the capital for the
seventh year in succession.
Instead, the company was ordered to invest an extra £150million by
2010 to replace nearly 230 miles of old water pipes in London."
Why don't they FINE and ORDER to invest???
If someone insists you spend an additional £150m fixing pipes, and
allows you nothing for that, then that sounds like a very stringent
financial penalty to me, a lot worse than being fined £60m which was
about the maximum they could have been fined. This means that the
financial penalty is applied to the benefit of customers, rather than
vanishing into the Treasury. I think it is a very good idea, and
certainly not a soft option.
--
echinosum
.
- References:
- hosepipe ban on for a year!!!
- From: Klara
- Re: hosepipe ban on for a year!!!
- From: Alan Holmes
- Re: hosepipe ban on for a year!!!
- From: EagleEyes
- hosepipe ban on for a year!!!
- Prev by Date: Greenhouse
- Next by Date: Re: Buddleia - dead head
- Previous by thread: Re: hosepipe ban on for a year!!!
- Next by thread: Re: hosepipe ban on for a year!!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|