Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: K <k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:24:14 +0100
Nick Maclaren <nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
In article <qfidnjJAFxeEFwv7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
K <k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
|> >
|> >Both are deciduous, so there will be light and water in spring. Even
|> >bluebells don't do well under evergreens, even when there is plenty of
|> >water.
|> >
|> Both had good leaf cover before the lily of the valley appeared, so I'm
|> not sure how valid the argument about light is. Water is likely to be
|> the key factor.
Could well be, but they still wouldn't make dense shade - there is a
world of difference between the shade under such things and under, say,
solid holly or conifers.
I'd agree with you about the magnolia, but the willow is a relatively dwarf one with incredibly dense foliage in many layers - it's certainly denser shade than the nearby holly. I'd have thought it was comparable to a juniper with a metre and a half clearance - that's if I've read Janet's post correctly.
--
Kay
.
- References:
- Lily-of-the-valley
- From: sue181
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: mrs-baggins
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: Alan Holmes
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: Martin Pentreath
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: Janet Galpin
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: K
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: K
- Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- From: Nick Maclaren
- Lily-of-the-valley
- Prev by Date: Re: Lemon balm - uses in the kitchen?
- Next by Date: Re: garden birds
- Previous by thread: Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- Next by thread: Re: Lily-of-the-valley
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|