Re: Hosepipe ban and RHS
- From: "Mike Lyle" <mike_lyle_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:00:25 +0100
thirsty@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
Water Industry Act (para 76.) from link on the rhs site.
76.-(1) If a water undertaker [...]
A remarkably appropriate expression, if I may say so, Bernard. We civil
servants are here merely as humble pawns to do the bidding of Her
Majesty's Government: we are not empowered to point out in public that
we foresee that the proposed privatisation must needs, in the event,
prove an almighty cockup, but I fancy we may very occasionally be
permitted a touch of wry humour in the draft papers we prepare. I am
suggesting nothing, of course; but the Minister would perhaps not notice
the precise form of words if the document were by some mischance to be
placed at the bottom of his box.
--
Mike.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hosepipe ban and RHS
- From: garden-addicted
- Re: Hosepipe ban and RHS
- References:
- Hosepipe ban and RHS
- From: thirsty
- Hosepipe ban and RHS
- Prev by Date: Re: leather jackets
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with my daffs
- Previous by thread: Re: Hosepipe ban and RHS
- Next by thread: Re: Hosepipe ban and RHS
- Index(es):