Re: gates.
- From: "middleton.walker" <middleton.walker@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:40:47 -0500
"Rupert" <reply@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43a00c14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "middleton.walker" <middleton.walker@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:7qidnTDE-ZPMZwLeRVn-gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "La puce" <helene@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1134519483.571519.70400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Alan Holmes wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don't you mean 'revultion'?
>>
>> snip
>>> I know it's going back to some whatever discussion we've had, but it's
>>> obvious that she'll have a go at anyone responding to Mike, or agreeing
>>> with him, and with me for that matter and I've only been here 2
>>> months!! And Mike is visibly going loopy with this on going rubbish.
>>>
>>> <deep sigh>
>>>
>> will give Janet an opportunity to revile me.....Mike, like most of us
>> have our own peculiarities....and, in all probablity, recognise them for
>> what they are....frankly I like Mike's style of 'telling it as it
>> is'....a lot of the folk I know have ceased asking me questions of the
>> type...."well, the type of 'what do you think' and are hoping for a
>> specific answer....example...'what do you think of my new hat'....I am no
>> longer asked those questions as my answer reflect my true thoughts and in
>> many many case are not what the asker really wishes to hear....so, to
>> Mike and all those who wish to 'tell it as it is' and speak the truth as
>> they know it to be then .........please, pretty please do not
>> change....it is those that revile the truth sayers that should
>> 'reconsider'......live and let live sayeth I......a Yorkshireman (still)
>>
> O.K a fellow Yorkshireman agrees with the sentiment of your post, however,
> there are limits to plain speaking .
> If someone constantly makes vitriolic comments for no particular reason
> then that's just plain stupid and daft.
> In the case of "Mike" -he makes racist, homophobic and totally puerile
> comments both on this newsgroup and others.
> On occasions he does make a sensible contribution but that's a very rare
> event.
> I think it may have been in this newsgroup "I wished him dead".
> Is that plain enough?
Plain enough fellow Yorkshireman......plus.....also in my belief there is no
room for vitriolic comments that are unwarrented...."plain, stupid and daft"
are not exactly the words I wood use but in respect for this site will not
use.....
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gates.
- From: Rupert
- Re: gates.
- References:
- gates.
- From: landscapeadvice
- Re: gates.
- From: Spider
- Re: gates.
- From: Janet Baraclough
- Re: gates.
- From: La puce
- Re: gates.
- From: Spider
- Re: gates.
- From: Spider
- Re: gates.
- From: La puce
- Re: gates.
- From: Mike
- Re: gates.
- From: Alan Holmes
- Re: gates.
- From: La puce
- Re: gates.
- From: middleton.walker
- Re: gates.
- From: Rupert
- gates.
- Prev by Date: Re: gates.
- Next by Date: Re: gates.
- Previous by thread: Re: gates.
- Next by thread: Re: gates.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|