Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: Jaques d'Alltrades <rusty.hinge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:57:31 +0100
The message <C70qYhDyjAVDFw8D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
from David Rance <david.rance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> contains these words:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 Jaques d'Alltrades wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 Jaques d'Alltrades wrote:
> >
> >> >"Squirrels's nuts" for "the nuts of the squirrels" is also correct,
> >> >though not so often used;
> >
> >> Really? I'd like to verify that. Can you give me your source for that?
> >
> >If I could unforget - probably Miss Burbridge, around 1955.
> Hmm, I'm not sure she was correct. I don't think you'll find it in any
> book on English usage.
I have several, but Fowler seems still to be in store. The apostrophe
doesn't appear (on a quick look) to be mentioned in Plain Words by Sir
Ernest Gowers, and other English Language books are reposing with Fowler
innit.
--
Rusty
horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co full-stop uk
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: BAC
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- References:
- Other peoples cat's
- From: old git
- Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: Kay
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: Brian
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: BAC
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: Jaques d'Alltrades
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: David Rance
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: Jaques d'Alltrades
- Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- From: David Rance
- Other peoples cat's
- Prev by Date: Re: Removing Ivy "Residue"
- Next by Date: Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- Previous by thread: Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- Next by thread: Re: Other peoples cat's - OT response
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading