Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: "Babypink" <babypink2807@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:38:22 GMT
From a commercial point of view, I would say it's better if he were sold
within the next year - people aren't suspicous about unbacked four year
olds, but once he gets to five or older, people will suspect that
there's something wrong with him even when there isn't.
Catja
Exactly, which he does have a year or two on his side, after that its going
to be a little concerning I suppose. I am just thinking like I said about
the bigger picture and more for his future welgfare, but then again for
every one of him there are a few hundred more!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Nikki Overton
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- References:
- Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Babypink
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Catja Pafort
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Babypink
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Catja Pafort
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Jill
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Babypink
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Jill
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Babypink
- Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- From: Catja Pafort
- Question - Keeping on a Horse
- Prev by Date: Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- Next by Date: Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- Previous by thread: Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- Next by thread: Re: Question - Keeping on a Horse
- Index(es):