Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: NM <nik.morgan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:25:36 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 20, 6:49 pm, Harry Bloomfield
<harry.m1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ray Keattch explained :
This is all very suspect to me. You are suggesting following a car at a
distance to maintain vision of their rear lights - what if they are driving
badly and hit something stationary?
The fog was variable. I only followed at a safe distance until it
became unsafe.
I proceed on what I can see only.
As do I.
--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT) (L)http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
In the event of a traffic accident I can hear the prosecution asking,
"Why didn't you have your fog lights on?" if there was the slightest
hint that fog could have a contributory factor.
.
- References:
- Notice to motorists:
- From: Mr Benn
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Harry Bloomfield
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: DavidR
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Harry Bloomfield
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: DavidR
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Harry Bloomfield
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: DavidR
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Brimstone
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Bod
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Harry Bloomfield
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Ray Keattch
- Re: Notice to motorists:
- From: Harry Bloomfield
- Notice to motorists:
- Prev by Date: Re: Its quiet in here...
- Next by Date: Re: Its quiet in here...
- Previous by thread: Re: Notice to motorists:
- Next by thread: Re: Notice to motorists:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|