Re: That trailer...

Elder wrote:
In article <oNudnRJon5RLy9XaRVnyvQA@xxxxxx>, brimstone520-ng01
@yahoo.co.uk says...
Except that that's not how language is used is it? The exceptions are
implied, not specifically stated every time. Sensible people ...

Depends, I've been working with my boss(and the rest of the staff) on
some legal contract work before he signed it with the solicitor
regarding our relationship with a client who is about to sell his
company, and our restrictions/obligations/responsibilities.

If he hadn't gone back to the solicitors 3 or 4 times and pointed out
implied obligations and responsibilites, my boss and his company could
never sell, would be legally responsible for any action against the
client, and would not be indemnified against action taken when the
client requested work that may down the line have ramifications with
their end user.

He had to go back and get the exact all encompassing legal definition
written in, to make sure that all means all, and exact means exact.

Implied has no legal standing except where the definition includes
implied in the description.

Having said that, there is nothing to stop a brief arguing implied
meaning, and persuading a judge/magistrate/jury.

Ensuring that all aspects are covered in alegally binding contract isn't
exactly the same as a casual exchange on Usenet is it?


.