Re: inaccurate speed cameras

Rob wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

Dr Tann said: "The mobile cameras used are not 100% accurate.

"My system can track a GPS phone within half-a-meter of where it
is, whereas devices currently on the market can, at best, only
track a phone within five metres."

A spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said: "The
officer who operated the camera has since retired.

"Without his verbal evidence, we could not prove the case to the
required standard."

So the copper had retired, convenient or merely convenient?

So they'd have believed a cop's word over GPS data ?

They would have believed the data from the police mobile camera if the
operator had given verbal evidence. The scientist's invention, and the
claimed accuracy of its data, is a red herring. The CPS simply
offered no evidence and dropped the case.

And if he hadn't had that data?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: inaccurate speed cameras
    ... "The mobile cameras used are not 100% accurate. ... operator had given verbal evidence. ... The CPS simply offered no ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: inaccurate speed cameras
    ... "The mobile cameras used are not 100% accurate. ... operator had given verbal evidence. ... The CPS simply offered no ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: inaccurate speed cameras
    ... "The mobile cameras used are not 100% accurate. ... operator had given verbal evidence. ... The CPS simply offered no ...
    (uk.rec.driving)