Re: inaccurate speed cameras
- From: "Rob" <rsvptorob-newsREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:36:54 +0100
Eeyore wrote:
|| Brimstone wrote:
||
||| Dr Tann said: "The mobile cameras used are not 100% accurate.
|||
||| "My system can track a GPS phone within half-a-meter of where it
||| is, whereas devices currently on the market can, at best, only
||| track a phone within five metres."
|||
||| A spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said: "The
||| officer who operated the camera has since retired.
|||
||| "Without his verbal evidence, we could not prove the case to the
||| required standard."
|||
||| So the copper had retired, convenient or merely convenient?
||
|| So they'd have believed a cop's word over GPS data ?
They would have believed the data from the police mobile camera if the
operator had given verbal evidence. The scientist's invention, and the
claimed accuracy of its data, is a red herring. The CPS simply offered no
evidence and dropped the case.
--
Rob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: inaccurate speed cameras
- From: Alan Holmes
- Re: inaccurate speed cameras
- From: Brimstone
- Re: inaccurate speed cameras
- References:
- inaccurate speed cameras
- From: Brimstone
- Re: inaccurate speed cameras
- From: Eeyore
- inaccurate speed cameras
- Prev by Date: Re: Go Hamilton!
- Next by Date: Re: Morrisons petrol / mpg
- Previous by thread: Re: inaccurate speed cameras
- Next by thread: Re: inaccurate speed cameras
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|