Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- From: "Brimstone" <brimstone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:02:13 +0100
In news:MPG.1f025412be56751b98cdec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Conor said:
In article <xsudnSZDL6jspgXZRVnyvA@xxxxxx>, Brimstone says...
In news:i--dncoxMvDZrwXZRVnyvw@xxxxxxxxx,And his solicitor had no way of proving that they assaulted him.
JNugent said:
...is anyone really bovvered?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/5098256.stm
He probably was being taught the meaning of "respect".
I'd be seriously disappointed if it was proved that an experienced copper
ever assaulted a member of the public, no matter how annoying s/he might be.
But re-reading that report, is the loss of Mr Goodenough to society likely
to have a disastrous efffect?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- From: PC Paul
- Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- From: Tunku
- Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- From: Pete Smith
- Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- References:
- OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- From: JNugent
- Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- From: Brimstone
- Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- From: Conor
- OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- Prev by Date: Re: Walkie Talkies
- Next by Date: Re: extra day to pay for congestion charge
- Previous by thread: Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- Next by thread: Re: OK, it's not proper procedure, but...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
