Re: anyone awaiting the milton outcome.


"Pooh Bear" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43DF5983.9458581F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Mark Hewitt wrote:
>
>> "NeedforSwede2" <carl.robson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.1e49619b227ab2ab989952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Doesn't go to the high court today after the CPS appealed that he
>> > shouldn't have been aquitted?
>>
>> I thought you couldn't appeal against an aquittal, only a conviction?!
>
> Didn't they change the rules though ?

Perhaps but I thought that was only for very serious offences such as
murder, and only if there was substantial new evidence not available in the
first trial.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: anyone awaiting the milton outcome.
    ... Mark Hewitt wrote: ... >> Doesn't go to the high court today after the CPS appealed that he ... Graham ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Has high court judge libelled Van Hoogstraten?
    ... >> is the evidence that is required to overcome the unlikelihood of what is ... > conviction against that person. ... > pronouncement attributing responsibility. ... I have far more faith in a High Court judge than in a jury of 12 angry men. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: TSG charges?
    ... Stephenson, were forced to admit in the high court that Ahmad, a ... their supervising officer, Sergeant Paul Davis, refused to give ... evidence during the civil action, as did a fifth officer, PC Mark ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: After all this time...
    ... go to the high court. ... The trouble is they won't show him the evidence they ... proceedings, I'm not psure. ...
    (uk.rec.sheds)
  • Re: more power to their elbow
    ... > Mark Hewitt wrote: ... I have never seen or heard of a "play street" in my life. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.driving)